Welcome to The Save Room. We hope to be the one stop shop for all things gaming. Follow us to keep in touch with the latest updates, changes and announcments. Thank you for joining the community
If you find or experience any bugs/ issues or crashes, please make a post using the "bug-report" tag to let us know of them right away. For any general feedback you have from features and changes we should make to criticism or praises, please make a post using the "player-feedback" tag. We'd love to hear your feedback to help make this site better for all.
Is silksong really as hard as they say it is? Can you say it terms of dark souls
Do you call this game clair obscur or expedition 33 or something else?
so does anyone else find it funny xbox wants to charge $360 a year
What is everyone thoughts on the Game Awards?
It looks good with the trailers and gameplay. But remember. No pre-orders.
Battle royale games, once the hottest thing in multiplayer gaming, have long since passed their peak. What started as a thrilling new way to deliver tension and player-driven storytelling has become a formulaic and overcrowded genre. Today, every other game tries to slap on a “battle royale mode” just to chase those huge player numbers, but few capture the original excitement or innovation. The massive player counts, while impressive, often come at the expense of meaningful gameplay depth or strategy—turning matches into chaotic, RNG-driven scrambles rather than tactical showdowns. I believe the future of multiplayer gaming isn’t about flooding players into gigantic maps with dozens or hundreds of opponents. Instead, the real evolution will come from smaller-scale, highly refined experiences that focus on skill, teamwork, and emergent storytelling. Games that emphasize meaningful player interaction—whether that’s through intricate mechanics, well-crafted environments, or narrative-driven objectives—will create more memorable, lasting communities than any 100-player free-for-all ever could.